EUS-guided drainage is more successful in pancreatic pseudocysts compared with abscesses

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 4

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

408

HTML

4022

Figures (1-4)

242

Tables (1-3)

196

Sum=4868

Jan 28, 2011 (publication date) through Nov 7, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2011; 17(4): 499-505
Published online Jan 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i4.499

Table 3 Some technical aspects of the drainage, etiology and location of the cysts

Drainage technique	No. of procedures	Anesthesia	Etiology	Type of pancreatitis	Location
Giovannini Needle Wire¹ in 16 cases	One in 19 patients	Sedation² in 19 patients	Alcohol (11)	Chronic pancreatitis in 14 patients	Cauda in 12 patients
19-guage needle¹ in 11 cases	Two in 6 patients	Intubation anesthesia in 7 patients	Idiopathic (6)	Acute pancreatitis in 12 patients	Corpus in 11 patients
Cystotome¹ in 1 case	Eight in one patient		Gallstone (3)		Caput in 3 patients
			1 hyperlipidemia
			1 trauma
			1 postoperative
			1 SLE
			1 medication
			1 malignant

¹Cook Endoscopy, Winston-Salem, NC;

²Pethidine + midazolam. SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus.

Citation: Sadik R, Kalaitzakis E, Thune A, Hansen J, Jönson C. EUS-guided drainage is more successful in pancreatic pseudocysts compared with abscesses. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(4): 499-505
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i4/499.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i4.499