Cystic dystrophy of the duodenal wall is not always associated with chronic pancreatitis

Table 8 Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients in the 38 case report papers involving 46 subjects with a benign cystic duodenal wall (a paper may report more than one patient), The three cases reported in the present paper are also shown (continues from Table 7)

Author[Ref.] yr	Surgery	Type of surgery	Endoscopic treatment	Associated chronic pancreatitis	Associated neoplasms	Pseudocyst	Follow-up	Death
Bill et al[74] 1982	Yes	PD	No	NR	No	No	No	NR
Holstege et al[75] 1985	Yes	WP	No	No	No	No	No	NR
Tio et al[9] 1991	No		No	No	No	No	7 yr	No
Tio et al[9] 1991	Yes	Derivative surgery	No	No	No	No	6 mo	NR
Flaherty et al[75] 1992	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	9 mo	No
Izbicki et al[77] 1994	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	6 yr	No
Fujita et al[14] 1997	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	3 yr	No
Shudo et al[17] 1998	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Wu et al[78] 1998	Yes	WP	No	No	No	No	9 mo	No
Babál et al[79] 1998	No		No	No	No	No	NR	During hospitalization
Rubay et al[21] 1999	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	2 mo	No
Balachandar et al[22] 1999	Yes	Derivative	No	Yes	No	No	NR	NR
Mohl et al[25] 2001	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	No	NR
Mohl et al[25] 2001	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	4 wk after surgery	No
Munthali Lovemore et al[26] 2001	Yes	Derivative CBD	No	No	No	No	No	NR
Indinnimeo et al[27] 2001	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	2 yr	No
Shudo et al[28] 2002	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Glaser et al[29] 2002	No		No	No	No	No	No	NR
Hwang et al[31] 2003	No		No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Jovanovic et al[32] 2004	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	No	NR
McFaul et al[80] 2004	Yes	PD	No	Yes	No	No	2 yr	No
McFaul et al[80] 2004	Yes	WP	No	Yes	No	No	NR	No
Isayama et al[33] 2005	No		Yes	No	No	No	12 mo	No
Chatelain et al[34] 2005	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	6 mo	No
Chatelain et al[34] 2005	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	12 mo	No
Balzan et al[35] 2005	Yes	PD	No	Yes	No	Yes (head)	No	NR
Sanada et al[43] 2007	Yes	PD	No	No	No	Yes (head)	No	NR
Balakrishnan et al[44] 2007	Yes	Laparotomy	No	Yes	No	No	NR	NR
de Tejada et al[50] 2008	Yes	WP	No	No	No	No	3 mo	No
Stefanescu et al[51] 2008	Yes	Derivative	No	No	No	No	8 mo	No
Varma et al[53] 2008	Yes	WP	No	No	No	No	9 mo	No
Galloro et al[54] 2008	Yes	WP	No	Yes	Cystadenoma	Yes	14 mo	No
				(with calcifications)
Thomas et al[59] 2009	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Levenick et al[61] 2009	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	3 yr	No
Levenick et al[61] 2009	Yes	PD	No	Yes	No	No	NR	NR
Levenick et al[61] 2009	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Levenick et al[61] 2009	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Yoshida et al[62] 2009	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	Yes (time NR)	No
Meesiri[64] 2009	No		No	No	No	No	Yes (time NR)	No
Funamizu et al[65] 2009	Yes	PD	No	No	Yes	No	15 mo	No
Viñolo Ubiña et al[66] 2010	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	No
Tezuka et al[67] 2010	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	NR	No
Lee et al[69] 2010	No		No	No	No	No	NR	NR
Egorov et al[70] 2010	Yes	Pancreas-preserving duodenal resection	No	No	No	No	6 mo	No
Egorov et al[70] 2010	Yes	Pancreas-preserving duodenal resection	No	No	No	No	5 mo	No
German et al[72] 2010	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	2 mo	NR
Pezzilli 2011 Present paper	No		Yes	No	No	No	20 mo	No
Pezzilli 2011 Present paper	Yes	PD	No	No	No	No	7 mo	No
Pezzilli 2011 Present paper	Yes	PD	No	Autoimmune pancreatitis	Yes	No	4 mo	No
Overall	41/49	-	2/49	8/48	3/49	3/49	17.9 ± 20.6 mo	1/28
	(83.70%)		(4.10%)	(16.70%)	(6.10%)	(6.10%)		(3.60%)

CBD: Common bile duct; NR: Not reported; PD: Pancreaticoduodenectomy; WP: Whipple procedure.