Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2011; 17(36): 4118-4123
Published online Sep 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4118
Published online Sep 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4118
Variable | Non recurrence group(n = 235) | Recurrence group(n = 24) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 57.5 ± 15.2 | 62.4 ± 11.6 | 0.064 | |
Gender (M/F) | 116/119 | 11/13 | 0.742 | |
Common bile duct diameter (mm)1 | 15.8 ± 6.2 | 20.6 ± 7.6 | 0.001 | |
Sum of angle (°)1 | 314.9 ± 20.0 | 268.3 ± 29.6 | 0.001 | |
T-tube drainage | No | 145 (95.4) | 7 (4.6) | 0.002 |
Yes | 90 (84.1) | 17 (15.9) | ||
Periampullary diverticulum2 | No | 111 (93.3) | 8 (6.7) | 0.091 |
Yes | 97 (86.6) | 15 (13.4) |
- Citation: Seo DB, Bang BW, Jeong S, Lee DH, Park SG, Jeon YS, Lee JI, Lee JW. Does the bile duct angulation affect recurrence of choledocholithiasis? World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(36): 4118-4123
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i36/4118.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4118