Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2011; 17(33): 3824-3829
Published online Sep 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3824
Published online Sep 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3824
F≥2 | F = 4 | ||||||||||||
Cut-off | Se | Sp | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | Cut-off | Se | Sp | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | ||
TE + ARFI | 6.7 kPa and 1.2 m/s | 60.5 | 93.3 | 96.8 | 41.1 | 68 | 12.2 kPa and 1.8 m/s | 84.9 | 94.4 | 84.9 | 94.4 | 91.8 | |
TE or ARFI | 6.7 kPa or 1.2 m/s | 86.1 | 71.1 | 90.9 | 60.3 | 82.7 | 12.2 kPa or 1.8 m/s | 96.2 | 83.3 | 68 | 98.3 | 86.8 |
- Citation: Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Bota S, Badea R, Lupşor M, Focşa M, Dănilă M. Is it better to use two elastographic methods for liver fibrosis assessment? World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(33): 3824-3829
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i33/3824.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3824