Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2011; 17(33): 3824-3829
Published online Sep 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3824
Published online Sep 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3824
F≥2 | F = 4 | ||||||||||||||
Cut-off | AUROC | Se | S | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | Cut-off | AUROC | Se | Sp | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | ||
TE | 6.7 kPa | 0.87 | 77.5 | 86.7 | 94.8 | 54.9 | 79.6 | 12.2 kPa | 0.97 | 96.2 | 89.6 | 78.1 | 98.3 | 91.4 | |
ARFI | 1.2 m/s | 0.84 | 76.9 | 86.7 | 95.7 | 54.1 | 79.3 | 1.8m/s | 0.91 | 90.4 | 85.6 | 50.3 | 95.8 | 83.4 |
- Citation: Sporea I, Şirli R, Popescu A, Bota S, Badea R, Lupşor M, Focşa M, Dănilă M. Is it better to use two elastographic methods for liver fibrosis assessment? World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(33): 3824-3829
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i33/3824.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3824