Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2011; 17(3): 366-371
Published online Jan 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i3.366
Published online Jan 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i3.366
Table 1 Complications encountered in the 61 patients and their management
| Complication | n (%) | Management |
| Pancreatic fistula | 31 (50.8) | Tube drainage-20 |
| Stenting-11 | ||
| Fistulojejunostomy-1 | ||
| Distal pancreatectomy-1 | ||
| Enteric fistula | 11 (18.0) | |
| Small bowel | 2 (3.2) | Tube drainage-2 |
| Large bowel | 9 (14.7) | Defunctioning ileostomy-9 |
| Spontaneous healing-5 | ||
| Segmental colectomy-4 | ||
| Bleeding | 4 (6.5) | |
| Pseudo-aneurysm | 3 (5) | Angioembolization-3 |
| DIC | 1 (1.6) | Platelets, factor VII |
| Secondary fungal infection | 9 (14.7) | Antifungals |
| Wound infection | 18 (29.5) | Wound drainage and dressings |
| Intestinal obstruction | 3 (5) | Conservative-2 |
| Laparotomy-1 | ||
| Pseudocyst | 2 (3.2) | Cystojejunostomy-1 |
| Open drainage-1 | ||
| Pelvic abscess | 1 (1.6) | Pig tail drainage-1 |
- Citation: Doctor N, Philip S, Gandhi V, Hussain M, Barreto SG. Analysis of the delayed approach to the management of infected pancreatic necrosis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(3): 366-371
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i3/366.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i3.366