Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2011; 17(21): 2602-2610
Published online Jun 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i21.2602
Published online Jun 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i21.2602
Table 3 Inter-observer agreement rate before and after consensus conferences
| Agreement rate (%) | Before (%) | After (%) |
| 0-50 | 16 (38.1) | 1 (2.4) |
| 51-60 | 13 (31.0) | 4 (9.5) |
| 61-70 | 3 (7.1) | 8 (19.0) |
| 71-80 | 5 (11.9) | 6 (14.3) |
| 81-90 | 3 (7.1) | 6 (14.3) |
| 91-100 | 2 (4.8) | 17 (40.5) |
| Total | 42 (100) | 42 (100) |
- Citation: Kim JM, Cho MY, Sohn JH, Kang DY, Park CK, Kim WH, Jin SY, Kim KM, Chang HK, Yu E, Jung ES, Chang MS, Joo JE, Joo M, Kim YW, Park DY, Kang YK, Park SH, Han HS, Kim YB, Park HS, Chae YS, Kwon KW, Chang HJ, Pathologists TGPSGOKSO. Diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia: Dilemma for Korean pathologists. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(21): 2602-2610
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i21/2602.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i21.2602