Resected specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up after STARR procedures

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 19

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

370

HTML

5255

Figures (1-2)

214

Tables (1-2)

200

Sum=6039

May 21, 2011 (publication date) through Jul 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2011; 17(19): 2411-2416
Published online May 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i19.2411

Table 1 Specimen and clinical data of the two groups under study

	STARR with double PPH-1 (15)	STARR with CCS 30 (15)
Specimen (mean)
Surface (cm²)	36.9	54.5¹
Volume (cc)	23.8	29.8¹
VAS postoperative score (mean)
1st day	2.55	1.3
2nd day	0.95	1.1
Post-operative morbidity	None	1 (3.3%)²
Hospital stay (mean)	3.4	3.1

¹Comparison is statistically significant (P < 0.05);

²One case of acute bleeding. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) with PPH-1 vs STARR with CCS 30. VAS: Visual Analogical Scale.

Citation: Naldini G, Cerullo G, Menconi C, Martellucci J, Orlandi S, Romano N, Rossi M. Resected specimen evaluation, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasonography and clinical follow-up after STARR procedures. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(19): 2411-2416
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i19/2411.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i19.2411