Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2011; 17(11): 1468-1474
Published online Mar 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1468
Published online Mar 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1468
Table 2 Summary of the proportion of patients within each cluster who were positive for constipation1 or irritable bowel syndrome on the basis of Rome III criteria, as well as proportions in each group with slow transit constipation
Clusters (4-fold solution) | ||||
1(n = 71) | 2(n = 44) | 3(n = 34) | 4(n = 43) | |
Rome III constipation | ||||
Yes | 84.50% | 77.30% | 58.80% | 72.10% |
Rome III IBS | ||||
Yes | 52.10% | 27.30% | 20.60% | 53.50% |
Outlet dysfunction | ||||
Yes | 52.10% | 56.80% | 52.90% | 48.80% |
Colonic transit | n = 43 | n = 28 | n = 16 | n = 29 |
Delayed transit | 74.40% | 71.40% | 62.50% | 79.30% |
Normal transit | 25.60% | 28.60% | 37.50% | 20.70% |
- Citation: Dinning PG, Jones M, Hunt L, Fuentealba SE, Kalanter J, King DW, Lubowski DZ, Talley NJ, Cook IJ. Factor analysis identifies subgroups of constipation. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(11): 1468-1474
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i11/1468.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1468