Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2011; 17(1): 123-129
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123
RFA | ||
Percataneous (n = 89) | Surgical (n = 108) | |
Segment location | ||
I | 0 | 0 |
II | 7 | 12 |
III | 13 | 17 |
IV | 9 | 12 |
V | 10 | 14 |
VI | 6 | 11 |
VII | 12 | 20 |
VIII | 12 | 7 |
Adjacent vessels or organs | ||
PH | 8 | 12 |
RHV | 17 | 15 |
MHV | 8 | 12 |
LHV | 11 | 16 |
IVC | 6 | 8 |
Heart | 3 | 5 |
Stomach | 9 | 17 |
Lung | 15 | 2 |
R.Kidney | 4 | 7 |
Colon | 5 | 12 |
GB | 3 | 2 |
-
Citation: Huang JW, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Croome KP, Yan LN, Wu H, Chen ZY, Prasoon P, Zeng Y. Surgical
vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in dangerous locations. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(1): 123-129 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i1/123.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.123