Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium

doi:10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.1

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 1

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5759)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

414

HTML

4783

Figures (1-3)

315

Tables (1-2)

247

Sum=5759

Jan 7, 2011 (publication date) through Nov 8, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (52)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Editorial

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2011; 17(1): 1-6
Published online Jan 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.1

Table 2 Common factors associated with failed biliary stone removal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Patient factors

Abnormal anatomy

Prior surgery

Extremely J-shaped stomach

Large hernias

Malrotations

Unstable or difficult endoscope position

Short duodenal bulb

Abnormal anatomy

Long duodenoscope position

Bile duct abnormalities

Presence of ductal strictures

Severely dilated ducts

Stone factors

Size

Large size

Location

Intrahepatic

Cystic duct

Proximal to strictures

Impacted stones

Citation: Parsi MA. Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(1): 1-6
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i1/1.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.1