Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2010; 16(45): 5662-5668
Published online Dec 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5662
Published online Dec 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5662
Table 1 Published studies comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery with open colorectal surgery
Study, yr | Patients (HALC vs open) | Indication | Procedure | OT (min) | Blood loss (mL) | Analgesia narcotics or POD | Diet (POD) | Complications | LOS (d) |
Maartense et al[17], 2004 | 30 vs 30 | UC and FAP | RPIPAA | 214 vs 133 | 262 vs 300 | 30 mg vs 31 mg | 6 vs 7 | 20% vs 17% | 10 vs 11 |
Chung et al[16], 2007 | 41 vs 40 | Cancer | R. colectomy | 110 vs 97 | 35 vs 50 | 19 mg vs 54 mg | 3 vs 3 | 9.7% vs 22.5% | 7 vs 9 |
Kang et al[18], 2004 | 30 vs 30 | Benign and malignant CR diseases | Colectomies (R, L and total), AP | 169 vs 172 | 193 vs 84 | 2.6 d vs 3.3 d | 3.7 vs 4.4 | 13% vs 30% | 8 vs 10 |
- Citation: Meshikhes AWN. Controversy of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(45): 5662-5668
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i45/5662.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5662