Linear endoscopic ultrasonography vs magnetic resonance imaging in ampullary tumors

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 44

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

347

HTML

3295

Figures (1-3)

237

Tables (1-2)

155

Sum=4034

Nov 28, 2010 (publication date) through Jul 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2010; 16(44): 5592-5597
Published online Nov 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5592

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Ampullary tumor, low-grade dysplasia (A) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (B). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE), original magnification 40 ×.

Citation: Manta R, Conigliaro R, Castellani D, Messerotti A, Bertani H, Sabatino G, Vetruccio E, Losi L, Villanacci V, Bassotti G. Linear endoscopic ultrasonography vs magnetic resonance imaging in ampullary tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(44): 5592-5597
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i44/5592.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5592