Endoscopic management of occluded metal biliary stents: Metal versus 10F plastic stents

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 42

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

402

HTML

2334

Figures (1-1)

231

Tables (1-4)

189

Sum=3156

Nov 14, 2010 (publication date) through Oct 2, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2010; 16(42): 5347-5352
Published online Nov 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5347

Table 2 Patient characteristics

	SEMS group	PS group	P value
No. of patients	29	27
Gender (M:F)	18:11	19:8	0.512
Age at initial SEMS insertion, median (yr)	66	66	0.352
Diagnoses			0.277
Pancreatic cancer	15	6
Common bile duct cancer	3	5
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma	4	4
Gallbladder cancer	3	6
Metastatic lymph nodes	3	2
Ampulla of Vater cancer	1	3
Hepatocellular carcinoma	0	1
Anti-cancer therapy	21	15	0.188

SEMS: Self-expandable metal stent; PS: Plastic stent.

Citation: Yoon WJ, Ryu JK, Lee JW, Ahn DW, Kim YT, Yoon YB, Woo SM, Lee WJ. Endoscopic management of occluded metal biliary stents: Metal versus 10F plastic stents. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(42): 5347-5352
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i42/5347.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5347