Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2010; 16(42): 5267-5271
Published online Nov 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5267
Published online Nov 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5267
Table 2 Short term outcome after sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence
Author | n | Obstetric/surgery | Results (%) excellent/good | Fair | Poor |
Fleshman et al[20], 1991 | 55 | 100 | 72 | 22 | 6 |
Wexner et al[21], 1991 | 16 | 100 | 76 | 19 | 5 |
Engel et al[22], 1994 | 55 | 100 | 79 | - | 21 |
Oliveira et al[23], 1996 | 55 | 99 | 71 | 9 | 20 |
Felt-Bersma et al[24], 1996 | 18 | 94 | 72 | - | 28 |
Nikiteas et al[3], 1996 | 42 | 88 | 60 | 17 | 24 |
Sitzler et al[7], 1996 | 31 | 87 | 74 | - | 26 |
Ternent et al[25], 1997 | 16 | 100 | 44 | 31 | 25 |
Zorcolo et al[26], 2005 | 93 | 100 | 65 | 9 | 27 |
Barisic et al[27], 2006 | 65 | 86 | 74 | 17 | 9 |
- Citation: Altomare DF, Fazio MD, Giuliani RT, Catalano G, Cuccia F. Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(42): 5267-5271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i42/5267.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i42.5267