Partially covered vs uncovered sphincterotome and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 40

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

319

HTML

2576

Figures (1-2)

183

Tables (1-6)

180

Sum=3258

Oct 28, 2010 (publication date) through Aug 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2010; 16(40): 5077-5083
Published online Oct 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i40.5077

Table 4 Patterns of post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding

	Partially covered sphincterotome (n = 26)	Uncovered sphincterotome (n = 20)	P
Immediate	24	19	0.418
Trickle	14	12	0.748
Ooze	9	7	0.965
Pulsatile	1	-	0.558
Delayed	2	1	0.620

Citation: Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, Zavos C, Terzoudis S, Katsinelos T, Fasoulas K, Gelas G, Tzovaras G, Pilpilidis I. Partially covered vs uncovered sphincterotome and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(40): 5077-5083
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i40/5077.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i40.5077