Partially covered vs uncovered sphincterotome and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 40

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

332

HTML

2706

Figures (1-2)

206

Tables (1-6)

205

Sum=3449

Oct 28, 2010 (publication date) through Nov 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2010; 16(40): 5077-5083
Published online Oct 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i40.5077

Table 3 Risk factors for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding between the two groups

	Partially covered sphincterotome (n = 194)	Uncovered sphincterotome (n = 193)	P
Definite
Anticoagulation < 3 d after ES	3	5	0.365
Bleeding during ES	24	19	0.408
Cholangitis prior to ERCP	26	21	0.425
"Zipper cut" phenomenon	4	3	0.497
Maybe
Papillary cancer	7	6	0.771
Cirrhosis	5	3	0.359
Dilated CBD	72	74	0.865
CBD stone	143	136	0.382
Periampullary diverticulum	38	44	0.472
Precut (suprapapillary) sphincterotomy with extension	10	6	0.302

ES: Endoscopic sphincterotomy; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; CBD: Common bile duct.

Citation: Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, Zavos C, Terzoudis S, Katsinelos T, Fasoulas K, Gelas G, Tzovaras G, Pilpilidis I. Partially covered vs uncovered sphincterotome and post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(40): 5077-5083
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i40/5077.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i40.5077