Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2010; 16(4): 501-507
Published online Jan 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.501
Published online Jan 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.501
Table 2 AUROC for F0F1 vs F2-4 and F0-2 vs F3-4
| F0-1 vs F2-4 | F0-2 vs F3-4 | ||||||
| AUROC | SD | 95% CI | AdAUC | AUROC | SD | 95% CI | |
| APRI | 0.71 | 0.06 | 0.59-0.83 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.06 | 0.67-0.92 |
| FIB-4 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 0.63-0.87 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.06 | 0.76-0.99 |
| Forn’s index | 0.79 | 0.05 | 0.69-0.90 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 0.75-0.96 |
| Hepascore | 0.80 | 0.05 | 0.70-0.91 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 0.02 | 0.90-0.99 |
| SLFG | 0.83 | 0.05 | 0.73-0.93 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.87-0.99 |
| Fibrometer | 0.85 | 0.05 | 0.75-0.94 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 0.88-0.99 |
- Citation: Wu SD, Wang JY, Li L. Staging of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients with a composite predictive model: A comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(4): 501-507
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i4/501.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.501