Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2010; 16(35): 4436-4442
Published online Sep 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i35.4436
Table 4 Selected trials of intraluminal brachytherapy during preoperative chemoradiation or as preoperative monotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
Study, period of study (type of study)No. of patientsFollow up (mo)Treatment, protocolSphincter preservation ratesypT0Local recurrence rateDistant metastasisAcute toxicity (ileitis, proctitis), all gradesDisease free survival
Yanagi et al[6], 1986-1995 (retrospective)Arm A: 9660Arm A: MDR-ILBT→surgeryArm A: 72%Arm A: 8%Arm A: 23%38%Arm A: 72%
Arm B: 19ArmB: HDR-ILBT→surgeryArm B: 63%-Arm B: 5%Arm B: 16%74%Arm B: 68%
Arm C: 115Arm C: surgery aloneArm C: 42%Arm C: 21%Arm C: 17%Arm C: 65%
Kusunoki et al[10], 1986-1995 (case series)Perforation
Arm A: 595-108Arm A: MDR-ILBT→surgeryArm A: 74%Arm A: 0%
Arm B: 65Arm B: HDR-ILBT→surgeryArm B: 63%---Arm B: 11%-
Vuong et al[22], 1998-2001 (case series)4929 (16-48)HDR-ILBT→surgery→ chemoradiation-64%2%4.10%Grade 2 proctitis 100%-
Grade 4 dermatitis 4%
Ishikawa et al[23], 1988-1997 (case series)4179.2EBRT 30 Gy→HDR-ILBT 10 Gy × 4→surgery--15%10%61%71.80%
Jakobsen et al[24] (case series)50Not mentionedCRT 45 Gy→HDR-ILBT boost→surgery-27%--30%-
Present study3618 (5-22)Arm A: CRT 45 Gy→ILBT boost 5.5-7 Gy × 2→surgeryArm A: 66.7%Arm A: 58.8%N/AArm A: 70.6%-
Arm B: CRT 45 Gy→EBRT boost 5.4 Gy→surgeryArm B: 50%Arm B: 15.80%N/AArm B: 42.1%