Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2010; 16(34): 4329-4334
Published online Sep 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4329
Published online Sep 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4329
Unadjusted analysis | P value | Adjusted analysis1 | P value | |
VAT area (cm2) | 0.015 | 0.010 | ||
Quartile I (< 35.2) | Reference | Reference | ||
Quartile II (35.2-65.9) | 0.646 (0.202-2.059) | 0.671 (0.214-2.365) | ||
Quartile III (65.9-94.0) | 1.311 (0.637-6.094) | 1.997 (0.561-7.107) | ||
Quartile IV (> 94.0) | 3.491(1.154-10.557) | 5.665 (1.515-21.180) | ||
SAT area (cm2) | 0.414 | 0.960 | ||
Quartile I (< 109.3 ) | Reference | Reference | ||
Quartile II (109.3-139.7) | 1.139 (0.374-3.471) | 1.016 (0.316-3.271) | ||
Quartile III (139.7-179.2) | 1.97 (0.637-6.094) | 1.353 (0.378-4.841) | ||
Quartile IV (> 179.2) | 2.288 (0.720-7.268) | 1.227 (0.301-4.992) |
- Citation: Choi CW, Kim GH, Kang DH, Kim HW, Kim DU, Heo J, Song GA, Park DY, Kim S. Associated factors for a hyperechogenic pancreas on endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(34): 4329-4334
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i34/4329.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4329