Copyright
copy;2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2010; 16(33): 4187-4192
Published online Sep 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4187
Published online Sep 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4187
Figure 2 Case No.
2: detection by gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging and histological findings of the nodule in segment six. A: Ultrasonography (US) reveals an 8 mm hyperechoic nodule (arrow); B: Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid magnetic resonance imaging reveals a defect (arrow) in the hepatobiliary phase; C: The nodule is diagnosed as well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma by US-guided biopsy, showing cellularity more than two-fold that of the non-tumorous area.
- Citation: Mita K, Kim SR, Kudo M, Imoto S, Nakajima T, Ando K, Fukuda K, Matsuoka T, Maekawa Y, Hayashi Y. Diagnostic sensitivity of imaging modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 2 cm. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(33): 4187-4192
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i33/4187.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4187