Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy

doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 31

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3985)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

398

HTML

3239

Figures (1-2)

164

Tables (1-5)

184

Sum=3985

Aug 21, 2010 (publication date) through Nov 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (51)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905

Table 3 Multivariate analysis of determinants of faster cecal intubation time

Independent predictors	B¹	95% CI	P value
Consultant	0.55	0.47-0.63	< 0.001
Female sex	1.38	1.22-1.57	< 0.001
Use of hyoscine	1.48	1.21-1.81	< 0.001
Poor preparation	1.33	1.07-1.66	0.01

¹Average increase in cecal time per unit increase in the explanatory variable. e.g. the cecal time of consultants was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.47-0.63) times that of trainees.

Citation: Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H, Prakoso E, Darke J, Chettiar R, Rahman W, Davison S, Griffin SP, Selby WS, Kaffes AJ. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i31/3905.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905