Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905
Published online Aug 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905
CAC | SC | P value | |
Cecal intubation rate | 192/200 (96.0) | 195/200 (97.0) | 0.401 |
Cecal intubation rate by trainees | 140/159 (88.1) | 128/151 (84.8) | 0.401 |
Ileal intubation rate | 165/200 (82.5) | 158/200 (79.0) | 0.381 |
Ileal intubation rate by trainees | 126/159 (79.2) | 115/151 (76.2) | 0.511 |
Cecal time (min) (mean ± SD) (n = 387) | 9.94 ± 7.05 | 10.34 ± 6.82 | 0.212 |
Trainee cecal time (min) (mean ± SD) (n = 268) | 10.72 ± 6.75 | 9.66 ± 4.86 | 0.642 |
Total colonoscopy time (min) (mean ± SD) (n = 387) | 23.24 ± 13.95 | 22.56 ± 9.94 | 0.862 |
Trainee total colonoscopy time (min) (mean ± SD) (n = 268) | 25.97 ± 1.22 | 23.70 ± 0.72 | 0.472 |
- Citation: Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H, Prakoso E, Darke J, Chettiar R, Rahman W, Davison S, Griffin SP, Selby WS, Kaffes AJ. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(31): 3905-3910
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i31/3905.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905