Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2010; 16(28): 3510-3520
Published online Jul 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3510
Published online Jul 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3510
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Evaluated diagnostic accuracy | Did not evaluate diagnostic accuracy |
Quantitative results of diagnostic performance presented in a format that enabled a 2 × 2 contingency table to be extracted OR results presented as sensitivity, specificity and prevalence | 2 × 2 contingency table could not be extracted from results of diagnostic performance OR sensitivity, specificity and prevalence results not presented |
Index test of study was an ultrasound imaging technique | Index test included was not an ultrasound imaging technique OR included a non-ultrasound imaging technique as part of the index test |
Studies were conducted prospectively | Studies were not conducted prospectively |
The reference test for all subjects in the study was liver biopsy | The reference test for the study was not liver biopsy OR liver biopsy was not used for all subjects |
The sample population described were adults at risk of chronic liver disease | The sample population described included children OR sample population included adults not at risk of chronic liver disease |
The study was published as a case study, review or editorial |
- Citation: Allan R, Thoirs K, Phillips M. Accuracy of ultrasound to identify chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(28): 3510-3520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i28/3510.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i28.3510