Laparoscopic vs open left hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 22

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

375

HTML

4039

Figures (1-2)

277

Tables (1-2)

198

Sum=4889

Jun 14, 2010 (publication date) through Dec 1, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2010; 16(22): 2818-2823
Published online Jun 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i22.2818

Table 1 Surgical procedure for hepatolithiasis in 61 patients

Variables	LLH (n = 28)	OLH (n = 33)
Left hemihepatectomy	3	5
Left lateral segmentectomy	25	28
Combined with cholecystectomy	26	30
Combined with CBD exploration	22	31
T tube drainage	16	27
Primary suture of CBD	6	4
Intraoperative choledochoscope	28	28

LLH: Laparoscopic left hepatectomy; OLH: Open left hepatectomy; CBD: Common bile duct.

Citation: Tu JF, Jiang FZ, Zhu HL, Hu RY, Zhang WJ, Zhou ZX. Laparoscopic vs open left hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(22): 2818-2823
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i22/2818.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i22.2818