Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2010; 16(17): 2109-2119
Published online May 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i17.2109
Published online May 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i17.2109
Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity and Az value for differential diagnosis based on CE 2D US in prospective study
Lesion | Sensitivity | Specificity | Az value (95% CI) |
HCC | |||
Reader 1 | 89 (62/70) | 88 (43/49) | 0.95 (0.89-0.98) |
Reader 2 | 94 (66/70) | 86 (42/49) | 0.95 (0.90-0.98) |
Metastasis | |||
Reader 1 | 86 (24/28) | 96 (87/91) | 0.93 (0.85-0.97) |
Reader 2 | 82 (23/28) | 98 (89/91) | 0.95 (0.88-0.98) |
Hemangioma | |||
Reader 1 | 81 (13/16) | 97 (100/103) | 0.94 (0.80-0.99) |
Reader 2 | 88 (14/16) | 99 (102/103) | 0.95 (0.73-1.00) |
FNH | |||
Reader 1 | 60 (3/5) | 97 (111/114) | 0.97 (0.74-1.00) |
Reader 2 | 80 (4/5) | 98 (112/114) | 0.98 (0.66-1.00) |
- Citation: Luo W, Numata K, Morimoto M, Nozaki A, Ueda M, Kondo M, Morita S, Tanaka K. Differentiation of focal liver lesions using three-dimensional ultrasonography: Retrospective and prospective studies. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(17): 2109-2119
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i17/2109.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i17.2109