Original Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2010; 16(17): 2109-2119
Published online May 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i17.2109
Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity and Az value for differential diagnosis based on CE 3D US in prospective study
Focal liver tumorsDiagnostic criteria based on combined enhancement patternsSensitivitySpecificityAz value
HCC1, 2, 4, 6, 17, 18, 20Reader 191 (64/70)90 (44/49)0.94 (0.88-0.95)
Reader 294 (66/70)92 (45/49)0.96 (0.91-0.98)
Metastasis3, 7, 8, 9, 13, 19, 21, 22, 23Reader 186 (24/28)97 (88/91)0.95 (0.89-0.98)
Reader 282 (23/28)96 (87/91)0.94 (0.89-0.97)
Hemangioma10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 24Reader 194 (15/16)98 (101/103)0.98 (0.94-1.00)
Reader 288 (14/16)97 (100/103)0.97 (0.90-1.00)
FNH5Reader 180 (4/5)98 (112/114)0.99 (0.95-1.00)
Reader 280 (4/5)99 (113/114)0.98 (0.87-1.00)