Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 1999-2004
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999
Parameters (serum) | Well | Malnourished | Significance t test |
SGA assessment | n = 163 | n = 136 | |
Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.68 ± 1.06 | 4.83 ± 1.14 | F = 10.63, P = 0.001 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.52 ± 0.96 | 3.54 ± 0.79 | F = 10.61, P = 0.001 |
C reactive protein (mg/L) | 12.42 ± 16.48 | 22.08 ± 18.46 | F = 11.44, P = 0.001 |
NRI assessment | n = 108 | n = 191 | |
Lymphocyte count (%) | 25.56 ± 8.94 | 21.77 ± 10.08 | F = 11.55, P = 0.001 |
Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.25 ± 1.04 | 4.27 ± 1.35 | F = 8.27, P < 0.05 |
C reactive protein (mg/L) | 11.25 ± 8.86 | 19.97 ± 20.93 | F = 6.48, P < 0.05 |
- Citation: Filipović BF, Gajić M, Milinić N, Milovanović B, Filipović BR, Cvetković M, Šibalić N. Comparison of two nutritional assessment methods in gastroenterology patients. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(16): 1999-2004
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i16/1999.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1999