Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2010; 16(13): 1567-1576
Published online Apr 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1567
Published online Apr 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1567
Table 2 Performance of DWI and conventional MRI in the detection of liver metastases n (%)
Study | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | PPV | NPV |
Vandecaveye et al[30] | |||||
> 20 mm | |||||
B600 SI ratio | 100 | 81.8 | 94.9 | 93.3 | 100 |
T2-CE MRI | 96.4 | 81.8 | 92.3 | 93.1 | 90.0 |
< 20 mm | |||||
B600SI ratio | 91.2 | 82.9 | 86.7 | 81.6 | 91.9 |
T2-CE MRI | 67.6 | 61.0 | 64.0 | 59.0 | 69.4 |
Koh et al[32]1 | |||||
MnDPDP MRI | 81.3 | 93.0 | 88-92 | ||
DWI 0, 150, 500 BH | 78.3 | 95.0 | 83-90 | ||
MnDPDP MRI and DWI | 92.2 | 97.0 | 94-96 | ||
DWI RT | 88-91 | ||||
T2 MRI | 45-62 | ||||
Nasu et al[36] | |||||
DWI RT (0, 500) | 82 | 94 | |||
SPIO MRI | 66 | 90 |
- Citation: Kele PG, Jagt EJVD. Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(13): 1567-1576
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i13/1567.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1567