Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2010; 16(12): 1487-1494
Published online Mar 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i12.1487
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients who showed progression of the histologic score (progressors) vs those who showed overall improvement or no progression in histology (non-progressors)
ProgressorsNon-progressors
Age at diagnosis (mean ± SD) (yr)18.0 ± 8.816.6 ± 9.8
PhenotypeAll hepatic phenotype4 with hepatic phenotype; 2 with mixed hepatic and neurological phenotype
AST U/L (baseline) (normal range 15-43)60.0 ± 56.8 (range 18-44) (6)64.6 ± 51.3 (range 15-129) (6)
AST U/L (time of 2nd biopsy)45.1 ± 48.2 (range 20-143) (6)25.5 ± 9.7 (range 13-39) (6)
AST U/L (time of 3rd biopsy)27.3 ± 10.2 (range 13-44) (6)28.7 ± 10.8 (range 15-41) (3)
AST U/L (time of 4th biopsy)24 and 28 (2)
ALT U/L (baseline) (normal range 6-43)83.5 ± 40.2 (range 45-137) (6)84.5 ± 60.7 (range 15-164) (6)
ALT U/L (time of 2nd biopsy)48.5 ± 21.8 (range 24-80) (6)26.1 ± 12.3 (range 10-46) (6)
ALT U/L (time of 3rd biopsy)42.0 ± 17.2 (22 and 68) (2)32.7 ± 17.2 (range 8-48) (3)
ALT U/L (time of 4th biopsy)47.0 ± 7.0 (42 and 52) (2)
24 h urinary Cu μg/24 h (baseline)679.7 ± 504.0 (6)1245.0 ± 1649.0 (6)
Hepatic Cu mg/g dry liver (baseline)534.4 ± 298.7 (6)455.0 ± 245.3 (6)
Type of treatment2 = penicillamine; 4 = zinc3 = penicillamine; 3 = zinc
One patient switched to penicillamine during follow upNo change of treatment during follow up