Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2010; 16(12): 1430-1435
Published online Mar 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i12.1430
Published online Mar 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i12.1430
Model #1[38,41] | Model #2[42,43] | Model #3[44,45] | |
PGE2 WT vs TG | 45 vs 1752 | 30 vs 5502 | 22 vs 581 |
Challenge | |||
LPS/D-GalN | Protection | ND | Sensitization |
MCD/CCl4 | ND | Irrelevant | ND |
Jo2 (FasL) | Protection | ND | Protection |
Transaminases after challenge | |||
WT/TG (UI/L) | 3750/625 | 500/500 | 400/1600 |
Infiltration3 | No | Yes | ND |
Fibrosis3 | No | No | No |
Hepatitis3 | No | Yes | ND |
HCC-induction3 | ND | ND | ND |
- Citation: Martín-Sanz P, Mayoral R, Casado M, Boscá L. COX-2 in liver, from regeneration to hepatocarcinogenesis: What we have learned from animal models? World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(12): 1430-1435
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i12/1430.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i12.1430