Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2009; 15(47): 5966-5971
Published online Dec 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5966
Published online Dec 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5966
Table 2 The clinical characteristics of the BDSR group were compared with the PD group n (%)
| Characteristics | BDSR group | PD group |
| Total patients | 45 | 149 |
| Age (median, yr) | 65 (37-76) | 60 (31-78) |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 30 (66.7) | 102 (68.5) |
| Female | 15 (33.3) | 47 (31.5) |
| Median follow-up (mo) | 25.0 (4.0-104.0) | 21.9 (0.4-108.5) |
| T stage | ||
| T1 | 9 (20.0) | 32 (21.4) |
| T2 | 33 (73.3) | 20 (13.4) |
| T3 | 3 (6.7) | 90 (60.5) |
| T4 | 0 (0.0) | 7 (4.7) |
| N status | ||
| N0 | 32 (71.2) | 101 (67.8) |
| N1 | 13 (28.8) | 48 (32.2) |
| TNM stage | ||
| Ia | 9 (20.0) | 24 (16.1) |
| Ib | 23 (51.1) | 15 (10.1) |
| IIa | 0 (0.0) | 58 (38.9) |
| IIb | 13 (28.9) | 44 (29.5) |
| III | 0 (0.0) | 8 (5.4) |
- Citation: Lee HG, Lee SH, Yoo DD, Paik KY, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. Carcinoma of the middle bile duct: Is bile duct segmental resection appropriate? World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(47): 5966-5971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i47/5966.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5966