Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2009; 15(45): 5662-5668
Published online Dec 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5662
Published online Dec 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5662
Table 2 Comparison of preoperative US and CT diagnosis of 37 patients with GBCA presented as intraluminal mass, and 28 patients with GBCA presented as infiltrating tumor
| Intraluminal mass | Infiltrating tumor | |
| With gallstones | 12 | 22 |
| Preoperative US | 11 | 16 |
| True positive | 7 | 2 |
| False negative | 4 | 14 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 63.6 | 12.5 |
| Preoperative CT | 5 | 14 |
| True positive | 4 | 10 |
| False negative | 1 | 4 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 80.0 | 71.4 |
| Without gallstones | 25 | 6 |
| Preoperative US | 23 | 4 |
| True positive | 21 | 1 |
| False negative | 2 | 3 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 91.3 | 25.0 |
| Preoperative CT | 20 | 4 |
| True positive | 20 | 3 |
| False negative | 0 | 1 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 100 | 75 |
-
Citation: Lee TY, Ko SF, Huang CC, Ng SH, Liang JL, Huang HY, Chen MC, Sheen-Chen SM. Intraluminal
versus infiltrating gallbladder carcinoma: Clinical presentation, ultrasound and computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(45): 5662-5668 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i45/5662.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5662