Comparison of a modified anoscope and the purse-string anoscope in stapled haemorrhoidopexy

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 44

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

230

HTML

1659

Tables (1-2)

179

Sum=2068

Nov 28, 2009 (publication date) through Jul 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2009; 15(44): 5573-5578
Published online Nov 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5573

Table 2 Operation time, need for analgesics, and length of hospital stay of the patients, and the differences between the two groups (mean ± SD)

	Group 1 (PA)	Group 2 (MA)	P value
Operation time (min)	42.0 ± 8.4	27.7 ± 8.0	0.039
Needs for analgesics (average dose)
Diclofenac sodium	1.9 ± 1.5	1.5 ± 1.1	0.284
Pethidine HCl	0.8 ± 1.1	0.3 ± 0.6	0.070
Hospital stay (d)	1.7 ± 1.1	1.5 ± 0.7	0.449

Citation: Bozdag AD, Yaman I, Derici H, Tansug T, Deniz V. Comparison of a modified anoscope and the purse-string anoscope in stapled haemorrhoidopexy. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(44): 5573-5578
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i44/5573.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5573