Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2009; 15(42): 5352-5359
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5352
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5352
Table 4 Sensitivity results of meta-analysis of overall survival rates and safety (excluding the trial with low quality)
No. of studies | Splenectomy (n1/N) | Splenic preservation (n1/N) | RR/WMD (95% CI) | P-value for effect size | P-value for heterogeneity | Effect model | |
Overall survival rate stratified by different length of follow-up | |||||||
2 | 93/190 | 84/197 | 1.14 (0.92, 1.41) | 0.23 | 0.91 | Fixed | |
Postoperative morbidity and mortality | |||||||
Morbidity | 1 | 16/104 | 9/103 | 1.76 (0.82, 3.80) | 0.15 | NA | Fixed |
Mortality | 2 | 6/194 | 4/200 | 1.58 (0.45, 5.50) | 0.47 | 0.82 | Fixed |
- Citation: Yang K, Chen XZ, Hu JK, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Chen JP. Effectiveness and safety of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(42): 5352-5359
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i42/5352.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5352