Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2009; 15(42): 5352-5359
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5352
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5352
Table 2 The quality of the included randomized trials
| Study | Truly random | Concealed allocation | Baseline features | Eligibility criteria | Blinding assessment | Loss to follow-up | Intention to treat | Study quality |
| Csendes et al[63], 2002 | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | Fair |
| Toge et al[6], 1985 | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Poor |
| Yu et al[64], 2006 | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Fair |
- Citation: Yang K, Chen XZ, Hu JK, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Chen JP. Effectiveness and safety of splenectomy for gastric carcinoma: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(42): 5352-5359
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i42/5352.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5352