Brief Article
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2009; 15(42): 5346-5351
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5346
Table 1 The relationship between resection rate and clinicopathological variables (mean ± SD) n (%)
Clinicopathological variablesRadicality
R0 resection (n = 49)R1 + R2 resection (n = 22)Bypass or laparotomy (n = 49)
Tumor size (cm)4.8 ± 1.3b7.9 ± 2.211.0 ± 3.8
Histopathological type
Ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 60)15 (25.0)b10 (16.7)35 (58.3)
Cystadenocarcinomas (n = 39)25 (64.1)7 (17.9)7 (17.9)
Others (n = 21)7 (33.3)6 (28.6)8 (38.1)
Lymph node metastasis16 (32.7)b19 (86.4)43 (87.8)
Peri-organ involvement126 (53.1)b18 (81.8)40 (81.6)
TNM staging
Stage I + II (n = 17)17 (100.0)b00
Stage III (n = 16)14 (87.5)2 (12.5)0 (0)
Stage IVA (n = 34)18 (52.9)27 (20.6)9 (26.5)
Stage IVB (n = 53)013 (24.5)40 (75.5)