Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: Which is optimal?

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 42

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

376

HTML

4027

Figures (1-2)

378

Tables (1-3)

197

Sum=4978

Nov 14, 2009 (publication date) through Dec 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2009; 15(42): 5300-5306
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5300

Table 2 Small bowel (SB) distension and artefact in 114 consecutive MRFT or MRE examinations performed on 108 patients

	All Patients	MRFT	MRE
Good proximal bowel distension	76.3% (87/114)	65.3% (32/49)	84.6% (55/65)
Good distal bowel distension	93.9% (107/114)	97.8% (45/49)	95.4% (62/65)
No artifact	75.4% (86/114)	81.6% (40/49)	70.8% (46/65)
Good proximal and distal bowel distension	75.4% (86/114)	63.3% (31/49)	84.6% (55/65)

Citation: Lawrance IC, Welman CJ, Shipman P, Murray K. Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: Which is optimal? World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(42): 5300-5306
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i42/5300.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5300