Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2009; 15(42): 5300-5306
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5300
Published online Nov 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5300
Patients | MRFT | MRE | |
Gender: Male | 41.2% (47/114) | 32.65% (16/49) | 47.7% (31/65) |
Age (yr): mean (range) ± SE | 40.7 (14-78) ± 16.5 | 39.1 (14-74) ± 15.4 | 43.6 (17-78) ± 17.6 |
Indication | |||
Known or suspected CD | 86.0% (98/114) | 93.8% (46/49) | 80.0% (52/65) |
Iron deficiency anaemia | 7.0% (8/114) | 0% | 12.3% (8/65) |
Resistant coeliac disease | 3.5% (4/114) | 6.1% (3/49) | 1.5% (1/65) |
Other | 3.5% (4/114) | 0% | 6.2% (4/65) |
- Citation: Lawrance IC, Welman CJ, Shipman P, Murray K. Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: Which is optimal? World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(42): 5300-5306
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i42/5300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5300