Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2009; 15(38): 4833-4837
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4833
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4833
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological factors between LRP16 positive and LRP16 negative patients with gastric carcinoma n (%)
| Variable | LRP16 | Statistics value | |
| Positive group (n = 197) | Negative group (n = 139) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 165 (60.2) | 109 (39.8) | χ2 = 1.544 |
| Female | 32 (51.6) | 30 (48.4) | P = 0.214 |
| Age (yr) | |||
| ≤ 40 | 19 (55.9) | 15 (44.1) | χ2 = 1.544 |
| 41-65 | 114 (57.6) | 84 (42.4) | P = 0.756 |
| > 65 | 64 (61.5) | 40 (38.5) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | |||
| < 4 | 36 (46.8) | 41 (53.2) | χ2 = 11.593 |
| 4-7 | 117 (58.2) | 84 (41.8) | P = 0.003a |
| ≥ 8 | 44 (75.9) | 14 (24.1) | |
| Histologic differentiation | |||
| Well differentiated | 8 (47.1) | 9 (52.9) | χ2 = 1.165 |
| Moderately differentiated | 40 (61.5) | 25 (38.5) | P = 0.558 |
| Poorly differentiated | 149 (58.7) | 105 (41.3) | |
| Depth of invasion, T stage | |||
| T1 | 10 (43.5) | 13 (56.5) | χ2 = 9.041 |
| T2 | 55 (53.4) | 48 (46.6) | P = 0.029a |
| T3 | 113 (60.4) | 74 (39.6) | |
| T4 | 19 (82.6) | 4 (17.4) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| 0 | 49 (44.1) | 62 (55.9) | χ2 = 18.946 |
| 1-6 | 77 (60.2) | 51 (39.8) | P = 0.000a |
| 7-15 | 49 (68.1) | 23 (31.9) | |
| > 15 | 21 (84.0) | 4 (16.0) | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| Negative | 182 (56.9) | 138 (43.1) | χ2 = 8.543 |
| Positive | 15 (93.8) | 1 (6.2) | P = 0.003a |
| TNM stage | |||
| I-II stage | 63 (44.1) | 80 (55.9) | χ2 = 21.804 |
| III-IV stage | 134 (69.4) | 59 (30.6) | P = 0.000a |
- Citation: Li YZ, Zhao P, Han WD. Clinicopathological significance of LRP16 protein in 336 gastric carcinoma patients. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(38): 4833-4837
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i38/4833.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4833