Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2009; 15(38): 4810-4815
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4810
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4810
Classification based on surgical findings (No. of secondary extensions detected) | Overall accuracy | ||||
Absent (37) | Intersphincteric (7) | Ischiorectal (19) | Supralevator (3) | ||
Physical examination | |||||
Absent | 241 | 1 | 3 | ||
Intersphincteric | 5 | 41 | 3 | 2 | |
Ischiorectal | 8 | 2 | 121 | 62.1% (41/66)a | |
Supralevator | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
3D-EAUS | |||||
Absent | 321 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
Intersphincteric | 2 | 51 | 1 | 2 | |
Ischiorectal | 3 | 2 | 161 | 0 | 81.8% (54/66)b |
Supralevator | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
H2O2 3D-EAUS | |||||
Absent | 331 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Intersphincteric | 1 | 51 | 1 | 0 | |
Ischiorectal | 3 | 2 | 171 | 0 | 86.4% (57/66)c |
Supralevator | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
- Citation: Kim Y, Park YJ. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of an anal fistula with and without H2O2 enhancement. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(38): 4810-4815
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i38/4810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4810