Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2009; 15(38): 4810-4815
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4810
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4810
Classification based on surgical findings | Overall accuracy | |||
Intersphincteric (n = 26) | Transsphincteric (n = 34) | Suprasphincteric (n = 4) | ||
Physical examination | ||||
Intersphincteric | 201 | 9 | 0 | |
Transsphincteric | 7 | 231 | 2 | 68.7% (44/64)a |
Suprasphincteric | 0 | 2 | 11 | |
3D-EAUS | ||||
Intersphincteric | 241 | 4 | 0 | |
Transsphincteric | 4 | 291 | 1 | 84.4% (54/64)b |
Suprasphincteric | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
H2O2 3D-EAUS | ||||
Intersphincteric | 241 | 3 | 0 | |
Transsphincteric | 2 | 301 | 1 | 89.1% (57/64)c |
Suprasphincteric | 0 | 1 | 31 |
- Citation: Kim Y, Park YJ. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of an anal fistula with and without H2O2 enhancement. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(38): 4810-4815
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i38/4810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4810