Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2009; 15(32): 4062-4066
Published online Aug 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4062
Published online Aug 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4062
Table 3 Statistical analysis of estimated LV by each formula
| Formula | mean ± SD | t | P-value |
| Urata | 1208.73 ± 99.92 | -20.91 | P < 0.01 |
| Heinemann | 1486.85 ± 151.78 | -40.84 | P < 0.01 |
| Vauthey | 1357.40 ± 155.60 | -32.44 | P < 0.01 |
| Lee | 1275.36 ± 97.77 | -29.87 | P < 0.01 |
| Fan | 1034.28 ± 111.61 | 2.465 | P = 0.016 |
| Chengdu | 1058.70 ± 96.74 | -1.417 | P = 0.161 |
| ALV | 1050.10 ± 107.41 | ND | ND |
- Citation: Shi ZR, Yan LN, Li B, Wen TF. Evaluation of standard liver volume formulae for Chinese adults. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(32): 4062-4066
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i32/4062.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4062