Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2009; 15(32): 4062-4066
Published online Aug 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4062
Published online Aug 28, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4062
Author | Report date | Formula | Material used (race, number) |
Urata et al[7] | 1995 | ESLV = 706.2 × BSA + 2.4 | CT Volumetry (Japanese, 96) |
Heinemann et al[8] | 1999 | ESLV = 1072.8 × BSA - 345.7 | Autopsy (Caucasian 1332) |
Vauthey et al[9] | 2002 | LV = 18.51 × BW + 191.8 | CT volumetry (Western, 292) |
Lee et al[5] | 2006 | ESLV = 691 × BSA + 95 | LDLT (Korea, 311) |
Fan et al[4] | 2000 | ESLW = 218.32+BW × 12.29 + gender × 50.74 (M = 1, F = 0) | LDLT (Chinese, 159) |
Chengdu[6] | 2009 | ESLV = 334.024 + 11.508 × BW | LDLT (Chinese, 115) |
- Citation: Shi ZR, Yan LN, Li B, Wen TF. Evaluation of standard liver volume formulae for Chinese adults. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(32): 4062-4066
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i32/4062.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4062