Brief Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2009; 15(23): 2882-2886
Published online Jun 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2882
Table 2 Univariate analysis of patient characteristics and their predictive value for patient absenteeism from scheduled endoscopic procedure
ComparisonOR95% CIP-value
UrgencyNon-urgent vs urgent1.7901.211, 2.6450.0035
Direct to endoscopyNot direct vs direct0.8590.595, 1.2420.4199
Referring physicianSpecialist vs GP2.1651.200, 3.9060.0063
No referral vs GP2.3551.031, 5.379
AgeIncrements of 10 years0.9120.823, 1.0100.0757
SexFemale vs male0.9740.708, 1.3400.8714
Time of procedure7:30-10:00 vs 12:30-15:000.6510.423, 1.0010.0835
10-12:30 vs 12:30-15:000.9670.637, 1.468
Type of procedureColonoscopy vs flex-sig0.7410.439, 1.2500.2757
EGD vs flex-sig0.9640.558, 1.667
WeekdayTues vs Mon1.0000.580, 1.7230.9570
Wed vs Mon0.7540.439, 1.293
Thurs vs Mon0.8090.476, 1.373
Fri vs Mon0.4930.278, 0.873
Region< 10 mile radius vs < 60 mile radius1.5370.685, 3.4480.1110
< 60 mile radius vs > 60 mile radius1.0540.454, 2.449
Previous endoscopyYes vs no1.0390.738, 1.4640.8252
Waiting time3 mo increments0.8350.675, 1.0340.0980
New patientNo vs yes1.2930.921, 1.8150.1369