Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Published online Jun 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2708
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological and endoscopic characteristics for 583 study cases
| Small (≤ 10 mm) | Large (> 10 mm) | P value | |
| No. of lesions, n (%) | 120 (21) | 463 (79) | |
| Gender (M/F) | 85/35 | 289/174 | 0.09 |
| Age (yr), mean (range) | 61.5 (39-84) | 62.4 (30-90) | 0.86 |
| Macroscopic type, n (%) | |||
| Sessile (0-Is, Is+IIa) | 51 (42) | 233 (50) | 0.13 |
| Flat (0-IIa) | 14 (12) | 64 (14) | |
| Depressed (0-IIc, IIa+IIc, Is+IIc) | 55 (46) | 166 (36) | |
| Size (mm), mean ± SD | 8.3 ± 1.6 | 22.1 ± 9.6 | |
| Growth pattern (PG/NPG) | 38/82 | 250/213 | < 0.0001 |
| Location, n (%) | |||
| Rectum | 33 (27) | 213 (46) | 0.02 |
| Distal colon1 | 56 (47) | 139 (30) | |
| Proximal colon2 | 31 (26) | 111 (24) |
- Citation: Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fujii T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Kobayashi N, Emura F, Ono A, Shimoda T, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, Sano Y, Fujimori T. Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(22): 2708-2713
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i22/2708.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2708