Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2009; 15(21): 2644-2650
Published online Jun 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2644
Published online Jun 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2644
Table 2 Distribution and number of affected relatives of 256 probands
| Affected relatives | FGC (n = 112) | Non-FGC (n =144) | No. of affected relatives | Percentage | ||||
| Male proband (n = 76) | Female proband (n = 36) | Male proband (n = 98) | Female proband (n = 46) | |||||
| GC | Non-GC | GC | Non-GC | Non-GC | Non-GC | |||
| Father | 31 | 3 | 14 | 38 | 18 | 104 | 26.5 | |
| Mother | 17 | 5 | 9 | 24 | 19 | 74 | 18.8 | |
| Brother | 34 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 23 | 7 | 80 | 20.4 |
| Sister | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 41 | 10.4 |
| Son | 1 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 2.8 | |||
| Daughter | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 2.0 | |
| Second-degree | 17 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 27 | 16 | 75 | 19.1 |
| Total | 108 | 20 | 46 | 7 | 133 | 79 | 393 | 100 |
- Citation: Zhou XF, He YL, Song W, Peng JJ, Zhang CH, Li W, Wu H. Comparison of patients by family history with gastric and non-gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(21): 2644-2650
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i21/2644.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2644