Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340
Blake | Watterman | Latex | |
Ease of emptying the collecting bag | |||
Very easy | 7 | 7 | 9 |
Easy | 3 | 4 | 2 |
Difficult | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Very difficult | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Odor during the dressings | |||
None | 9 | 1 | 5 |
Bad | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Very bad | 0 | 7 | 3 |
Pain at the drain site (pain scale) | |||
0 (no pain) | 6 | 5 | 2 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
5 (very intense pain) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Pain during drain removal (pain scale) | |||
0 (no pain) | 7 | 4 | 3 |
1 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
5 (very intense pain) | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- Citation: Salgado Júnior W, Macedo Neto MM, dos Santos JS, Sakarankutty AK, Ceneviva R, de Castro e Silva Jr O. Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i19/2340.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2340