Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340
Published online May 21, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2340
Table 3 Paired comparison between the drains, regarding the drained volumes
| Postoperative days | Blake vs Watterman | Blake vs Latex | Latex vs Watterman |
| Day 1 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
| Day 2 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
| Day 3 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
| Day 4 | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
| Day 5 | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
| Day 6 | P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | P > 0.05 |
| Day 7 | P < 0.05 | P < 0.05 | P > 0.05 |
- Citation: Salgado Júnior W, Macedo Neto MM, dos Santos JS, Sakarankutty AK, Ceneviva R, de Castro e Silva Jr O. Study of the patency of different peritoneal drains used prophylactically in bariatric surgery. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(19): 2340-2344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i19/2340.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2340