Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2009; 15(18): 2265-2269
Published online May 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2265
Published online May 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2265
Table 1 Basal characteristics of 17 consecutive patients
Case no. | Gender | Age | Symptoms | Duration (d) | Comorbidity | Type of bezoar | Endoscopic findings | Size of bezoar |
CD group | ||||||||
1 | F | 69 | Indigestion | 21 | None | Phytobezoar | GU | Above 50% |
2 | F | 62 | Epigastric soreness | 21 | DM | Phytobezoar | GU | Above 50% |
3 | F | 49 | Indigestion, epigastric soreness | 14 | DM | Phytobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
4 | F | 51 | Indigestion | 20 | DM | Phytobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
PD group | ||||||||
5 | M | 48 | Epigastric soreness | 8 | None | Phytobezoar | DU scar with stenosis | Below 50% |
6 | F | 57 | Indigestion | 21 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
7 | M | 71 | Indigestion | 90 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
8 | F | 65 | Epigastric soreness | 10 | HTN | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
9 | F | 61 | Indigestion | 14 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
10 | F | 57 | Indigestion | 21 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Below 50% |
11 | F | 67 | Epigastric soreness | 60 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
12 | M | 63 | Epigastric soreness | 21 | HTN | Phytobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
13 | M | 78 | Indigestion | 30 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Above 50% |
14 | F | 75 | Epigastric soreness | 90 | DM | Diospyrobezoar | None | Below 50% |
15 | F | 54 | None | 7 | HTN | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
16 | F | 61 | Nausea and vomiting | 7 | None | Diospyrobezoar | GU | Below 50% |
17 | M | 63 | Epigastric soreness | 30 | None | Diospyrobezoar | Pyloric stenosis | Above 50% |
- Citation: Lee BJ, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim JH, Yeon JE, Jeen YT, Kim JS, Byun KS, Lee SW, Choi JH, Kim CD, Ryu HS, Bak YT. How good is cola for dissolution of gastric phytobezoars? World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(18): 2265-2269
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i18/2265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2265